w in the chat ($w)
3JoVeXYVDakjC45772N3oRXydwvpVC2ioVNhYDDRpump
$0.000007
0.00000002907 SOL
+3.32% (24h)
Market Cap
$7,019
Liquidity
$0
Holders
0(Top 10: 0.00%)
Blockchain
Solana
Contract Address
3JoVeXYVDakjC45772N3oRXydwvpVC2ioVNhYDDRpump
AGE
2 hours (Sep 15, 2025)
DEXes
Pumpfun
About w in the chat
The token originated from the idea that 'stream meta needs a good simple memecoin', with the background that the initiator hoped to promote the token's development by having the community spam 'w' in the chat. The token narrative logic is to encourage community members to continuously send 'w' in the chat to collectively push the token to the goal of 1 million+.
w in the chat (w) 3JoVeXYVDakjC45772N3oRXydwvpVC2ioVNhYDDRpump is a 2 hours old token on the Solana blockchain. Current price: $0.000007 (+3.32% 24h). Market cap: $7,019. Liquidity: $0. Contract: 3JoVeXYVDakjC45772N3oRXydwvpVC2ioVNhYDDRpump. Tracked on Dexscreener. Traded on Pumpfun.
Key Factors & Recent Activity 2025-09-15T05:31:52
- Telegram game news buzz: Airdrop details and listing set soon.
- Price and volume show active trade, fueling short-term hype.
- However, heavy rug pull stats raise major flags.
- Creator’s history shows many tokens flagged as scams.
Disclaimer: Information provided is for general purposes only and not financial advice. Meme tokens can be highly volatile. Always do your own research (DYOR).
w/SOL Price Chart
| Timeframe | Price Change | Volume (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Min | +0.00% | $0.00 |
| 1 Hour | +0.00% | $0.00 |
| 6 Hours | +3.32% | $197,190.94 |
| 24 Hours | +3.32% | $197,190.94 |
Statistics
Market Cap
$7,019
Volume (24h)
$197,190.94
Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV)
$7,019
Circulating Supply
0
Total Supply
0
Max Supply
0
Holders
0+
All Time High (ATH)
N/A
All Time Low (ATL)
N/A
Buyers & Sellers Overview
| Timeframe | Net Buyers | Total Traders | Buyers | Sellers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Min | +0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Hour | +0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 Hours | +221 | 2,159 | 1,190 | 969 |
| 24 Hours | +221 | 2,159 | 1,190 | 969 |
Net Buyers = Number of buyers minus sellers. Data summed across all available pairs for this token.
Listed On
Trackers:
Dexscreener
DEX Markets:
Pumpfun
Trading Pairs for
3JoVeXYVDakjC45772N3oRXydwvpVC2ioVNhYDDRpump
DEX: Pumpfun
Pair With: w/SOL
Liquidity: $N/A
5Ar8GCuu9Rm8dKXM5w5r9EFW9TRLBAaXPmj1oeeAN9Qy
Community Mentions For #w
Creator Capital Markets is not a “meta”, it’s a new paradigm for the entire internet economy.
One beta buy on Pump streamer culture is to buy the W coin. W is the universal way to celebrate 'in the chat'.
It may sound silly but I’m serious: iconic memes can return VC-like multiples in days.
CA: AumaQ5bXzpd5xjsR6snS34FbRGVNNtCF2z2QgVEmpump
One beta buy on Pump streamer culture is to buy the W coin. W is the universal way to celebrate 'in the chat'.
It may sound silly but I’m serious: iconic memes can return VC-like multiples in days.
CA: AumaQ5bXzpd5xjsR6snS34FbRGVNNtCF2z2QgVEmpump
1 8,991
Today I've sold one #Altcoin after 100% profits
Yes, it's finally time to be more active.
I've sold a portion of one of my #Altcoins to realllocate towards other ones, so I'll be able to compound those profits.
The background:
Just a few weeks ago I've decided to swap some of my smaller altcoins & $OP into $PEAQ.
A position of $4,500 allocated towards $PEAQ at a valuation of $0.06 per asset.
Now, you never know for sure when there's going to be a substantial breakout taking place on the markets, as you can't time those movements.
In this case, $PEAQ has rallied towards $0.126 and the portfolio went up massively.
The allocation started at $4,500, but became $9,500, while all other positions haven't done anything as of yet.
That creates an opportunity, which I'm quite often discussing:
- Arbitrage opportunities between timing of the other #Altcoins and their moves, as again, if fundamentally nothing has changed on the thesis, it's very likely to expect that they'll be following.
In this particular case, we swapped Optimism, Wormhole and Rocket Pool for PEAQ a month ago.
Case - We would have held those older positions
In that case, the allocation of $4,500 would still be $4,500-5,000 as the positions have barely moved.
Case 2 - We swapped for PEAQ
In this case, as we did, the allocation ran towards $9,500, resulting into an upwards result of +$5,000 and therefore the ability to keep on compounding the results.
That's great. We're at that point.
Referring back to the chart of PEAQ and the previous posts, the #Altcoin portfolio will be traded actively.
That means:
- I miss some trades as I'll cash too early.
- I'll be buying back in too early.
- I won't be buying back entirely.
That's just part of the entire strategy and you can't really help it as technically, compounding returns will outweigh trying to be the peako top massively.
In this case, the valuation was $9,500 and that's great, but we can see that it's quite overextended on the shorter timeframes.
- 1D 20-MA is far away
- 4H 20-MA is far away at this point
- 1W 20-MA is currently fighting as resistance and will probably turn one for a little while.
Now, the important part is; we don't have to close the entire position, we can just easily swap a little and compound those returns from this standpoint.
In this case, we sold $2,500 worth of PEAQ at $0.1260 and we allocated $1,500 into $W at $0.0908 and $1,000 into $REZ at $0.1192.
Again, let's use some cases:
If the case is that $PEAQ isn't going to continue moving upwards, then you'd be camping your money into an asset that has already provided the move.
Given the fact that I assume and have a thesis that $W and $REZ are about to give the same upside, we're foolish for staying into an asset that has made the move already, so we should be allocating back into other assets (but shouldn't be closing the position entirely).
In the case of simply holding the $2,500 into $PEAQ from $0.1260, we'd be down 15% already.
By the fact that we've swapped the $2,500 towards other positions and they barely moved, we've saved ourselves that 15% already.
Now, let's assume we'll be going upwards with those 2 coins and they double, while $PEAQ remains flat.
In that case, we make an additional $2,500 and could potentially rotate that back into $PEAQ at a later point.
Active portfolio management
By having the ability to be active with our portfolio management, we've secured ourselves the fact that we're back up to $65,000 with the #Altcoin portfolio.
Remind yourself; it started with $110,000 and we started buying $OP at $2.25, $TIA at $10 and $REZ at $0.14.
If those assets go back to the valuations that we started, by being this active in the bear market, we should be back to $275.000.
A profit of $165,000.
In the case of $PEAQ, we had two options:
- Hold in cash and buy back the same amount (or extra) in PEAQ through gamma scalping strategies.
- Allocate towards other #Altcoins to compound the returns.
We've clearly taken the second route and I'm sure we'll be trading it more actively to generate a higher return in the coming period.
Back in profits in October?
Let's go!
Yes, it's finally time to be more active.
I've sold a portion of one of my #Altcoins to realllocate towards other ones, so I'll be able to compound those profits.
The background:
Just a few weeks ago I've decided to swap some of my smaller altcoins & $OP into $PEAQ.
A position of $4,500 allocated towards $PEAQ at a valuation of $0.06 per asset.
Now, you never know for sure when there's going to be a substantial breakout taking place on the markets, as you can't time those movements.
In this case, $PEAQ has rallied towards $0.126 and the portfolio went up massively.
The allocation started at $4,500, but became $9,500, while all other positions haven't done anything as of yet.
That creates an opportunity, which I'm quite often discussing:
- Arbitrage opportunities between timing of the other #Altcoins and their moves, as again, if fundamentally nothing has changed on the thesis, it's very likely to expect that they'll be following.
In this particular case, we swapped Optimism, Wormhole and Rocket Pool for PEAQ a month ago.
Case - We would have held those older positions
In that case, the allocation of $4,500 would still be $4,500-5,000 as the positions have barely moved.
Case 2 - We swapped for PEAQ
In this case, as we did, the allocation ran towards $9,500, resulting into an upwards result of +$5,000 and therefore the ability to keep on compounding the results.
That's great. We're at that point.
Referring back to the chart of PEAQ and the previous posts, the #Altcoin portfolio will be traded actively.
That means:
- I miss some trades as I'll cash too early.
- I'll be buying back in too early.
- I won't be buying back entirely.
That's just part of the entire strategy and you can't really help it as technically, compounding returns will outweigh trying to be the peako top massively.
In this case, the valuation was $9,500 and that's great, but we can see that it's quite overextended on the shorter timeframes.
- 1D 20-MA is far away
- 4H 20-MA is far away at this point
- 1W 20-MA is currently fighting as resistance and will probably turn one for a little while.
Now, the important part is; we don't have to close the entire position, we can just easily swap a little and compound those returns from this standpoint.
In this case, we sold $2,500 worth of PEAQ at $0.1260 and we allocated $1,500 into $W at $0.0908 and $1,000 into $REZ at $0.1192.
Again, let's use some cases:
If the case is that $PEAQ isn't going to continue moving upwards, then you'd be camping your money into an asset that has already provided the move.
Given the fact that I assume and have a thesis that $W and $REZ are about to give the same upside, we're foolish for staying into an asset that has made the move already, so we should be allocating back into other assets (but shouldn't be closing the position entirely).
In the case of simply holding the $2,500 into $PEAQ from $0.1260, we'd be down 15% already.
By the fact that we've swapped the $2,500 towards other positions and they barely moved, we've saved ourselves that 15% already.
Now, let's assume we'll be going upwards with those 2 coins and they double, while $PEAQ remains flat.
In that case, we make an additional $2,500 and could potentially rotate that back into $PEAQ at a later point.
Active portfolio management
By having the ability to be active with our portfolio management, we've secured ourselves the fact that we're back up to $65,000 with the #Altcoin portfolio.
Remind yourself; it started with $110,000 and we started buying $OP at $2.25, $TIA at $10 and $REZ at $0.14.
If those assets go back to the valuations that we started, by being this active in the bear market, we should be back to $275.000.
A profit of $165,000.
In the case of $PEAQ, we had two options:
- Hold in cash and buy back the same amount (or extra) in PEAQ through gamma scalping strategies.
- Allocate towards other #Altcoins to compound the returns.
We've clearly taken the second route and I'm sure we'll be trading it more actively to generate a higher return in the coming period.
Back in profits in October?
Let's go!
1 10,193
I've stated before that I'll be trading my portfolio more actively.
I've swapped some #Altcoins and allocated $4,500 into $PEAQ.
On I've provided a long update on the trade that I've made.
What was the trade?
- $PEAQ allocation rallied to $9,500.
- I've sold $2,500 of PEAQ at $0.126.
- I've bought back $1,500 in W at $0.0908.
- I've bought back $1,000 in REZ at $0.1190.
The portfolio is on its highest level in 4 months: $65,000.
Let's go!
I've swapped some #Altcoins and allocated $4,500 into $PEAQ.
On I've provided a long update on the trade that I've made.
What was the trade?
- $PEAQ allocation rallied to $9,500.
- I've sold $2,500 of PEAQ at $0.126.
- I've bought back $1,500 in W at $0.0908.
- I've bought back $1,000 in REZ at $0.1190.
The portfolio is on its highest level in 4 months: $65,000.
Let's go!
0 10,394
Infinit_Labs 가 미래에 협력할 프로젝트는 어디가 있을가?
Oracle / 데이터 피드 제공자
Infinit 전략들이 제대로 작동하려면 자산 가격, RWA의 실물 수익 리포트, LTV, 디폴트 리스크 등 다양한 온체인 + 오프체인 데이터가 필요함.
-> Chainlink, @PythNetwork , Tellor, Switchboard 같은 프로젝트와의 연계가 중요할 수 있음.
Layer 0 / Cross-Chain 인프라
전략 에이전트가 여러 체인을 오가며 작동하려면 체인 간 브리지, 허브, Cross-chain 스왑 등이 문제없이 돌아가야 함.
-> LayerZero, Wormhole, Hop, Synapse 쓰일수 있음.
Stablecoin / 스테이블 자산 인프라
전략 구성 시 유동성 풀, 스테이블코인 활용을 위해 자산을 옮기거나 헤징(hedging)할 수 있는 stableswap 프로토콜 등도 필요할것 같다.
Risk Management / 보험 관련 프로토콜
자동화 전략의 위험, 스마트컨트랙트 버그, oracle 조작, 유동성 부족 등 을 줄일 수 있는 보험
->Nexus Mutual, Cover Protocol 정도가 떠오른다
현재 프로젝트가 그리고 있는 미래가 궁굼하다.
@Infinit_Labs
Oracle / 데이터 피드 제공자
Infinit 전략들이 제대로 작동하려면 자산 가격, RWA의 실물 수익 리포트, LTV, 디폴트 리스크 등 다양한 온체인 + 오프체인 데이터가 필요함.
-> Chainlink, @PythNetwork , Tellor, Switchboard 같은 프로젝트와의 연계가 중요할 수 있음.
Layer 0 / Cross-Chain 인프라
전략 에이전트가 여러 체인을 오가며 작동하려면 체인 간 브리지, 허브, Cross-chain 스왑 등이 문제없이 돌아가야 함.
-> LayerZero, Wormhole, Hop, Synapse 쓰일수 있음.
Stablecoin / 스테이블 자산 인프라
전략 구성 시 유동성 풀, 스테이블코인 활용을 위해 자산을 옮기거나 헤징(hedging)할 수 있는 stableswap 프로토콜 등도 필요할것 같다.
Risk Management / 보험 관련 프로토콜
자동화 전략의 위험, 스마트컨트랙트 버그, oracle 조작, 유동성 부족 등 을 줄일 수 있는 보험
->Nexus Mutual, Cover Protocol 정도가 떠오른다
현재 프로젝트가 그리고 있는 미래가 궁굼하다.
@Infinit_Labs
0 9,318
We’re managing deep and consistent liquidity for @wormhole’s $W on Ethereum and Base across @Uniswap and @aerodromefi, powered by Arrakis Pro.
$W secures Wormhole’s cross-chain messaging layer and drives governance for one of the most widely adopted interoperability protocols onchain.
$W secures Wormhole’s cross-chain messaging layer and drives governance for one of the most widely adopted interoperability protocols onchain.
1 13,666
I'm having close attention to $W.
If this one breaks the 20-Week MA, I'm sure it will start a strong uptrend and could have a 100%+ move.
I'll be sure trading that position in my #Altcoin portfolio.
Sharing here & on IG:
If this one breaks the 20-Week MA, I'm sure it will start a strong uptrend and could have a 100%+ move.
I'll be sure trading that position in my #Altcoin portfolio.
Sharing here & on IG:
2 14,219
⚡️ Wormhole ( $W ) vs LayerZero ( $ZRO )
Bridges are a key part of crypto infrastructure. They let tokens and data move across blockchains, solving the problem of isolated ecosystems. Today let’s compare two of the biggest players in this space.
⚙️ Tech
⏺ LayerZero is a protocol for direct cross-chain messaging. Assets aren’t locked in contracts, they’re minted on destination chains through its messaging system. It’s not just a bridge, but a universal messaging protocol.
⏺ Wormhole started as a classic lock-and-mint bridge. Today it has evolved into a full messaging protocol while keeping its bridge infrastructure.
How they work
⏺ Wormhole runs on a Guardian network. 19 validators (Guardians) sign messages, creating a cryptographic proof (VAA) that gets relayed to the target chain. It’s fast but more centralized, and a majority attack on validators could pose risks.
⏺ LayerZero uses the Ultra Light Node (ULN). Transactions are verified by two independent parties: an oracle (like Chainlink) and a relayer chosen by the app or user. This setup is flexible and lets developers fine-tune trust assumptions, but integration is more complex.
Both support major EVM chains plus Solana, Aptos, Sui, and many others.
🔒 Security
⏺ Wormhole was hacked in 2022 for $325M, exposing bridge contract risks. Protections have improved since, but validator centralization remains a weak spot.
⏺ LayerZero has not been hacked. Its main criticism is reliance on oracles and relayers. Without proper configuration, security can suffer, so developers integrating it carry part of the responsibility.
📊 Market position
⏺ $W (CMC #141) vs $ZRO (CMC #124)
⏺ $W: MCap $365M, FDV $770M, 24h Vol $41.7M
⏺ $ZRO: MCap $445M, FDV $1.85B, 24h Vol $23.2M
Despite similar market caps, ZRO’s FDV is much higher, reflecting both lower circulating supply and strong expectations for future unlocks.
📈 Metrics
⏺ Wormhole: 1B+ messages, 200+ apps, 30+ chains
⏺ LayerZero: 154M+ messages, 300+ apps, 120+ chains
💸 Investments
⏺ Wormhole: $225M (Multicoin, Jump Trading, Brevan Howard, others)
⏺ LayerZero: $318M (a16z, Sequoia, Multicoin, Delphi Digital, Binance Labs, others)
Both attracted top-tier investors, but LayerZero raised more and has broader backing, signaling higher confidence in its model.
👥 Community
⏺ Wormhole: CMC 101.8k, X 382k, GitHub 671
⏺ LayerZero: CMC 84.3k, X 726k, GitHub 2.5k
💡 Takeaway
⏺ LayerZero leads in market cap, app adoption, chain coverage, VC backing, and community engagement. It already looks like a core piece of crypto infrastructure.
⏺ Wormhole trails on some metrics but its strong Solana ties, ecosystem growth, and experience handling critical incidents keep it relevant.
Both aim to set the standard for cross-chain messaging. The question is: who will lock in the lead?
👉 More on LayerZero here:
Bridges are a key part of crypto infrastructure. They let tokens and data move across blockchains, solving the problem of isolated ecosystems. Today let’s compare two of the biggest players in this space.
⚙️ Tech
⏺ LayerZero is a protocol for direct cross-chain messaging. Assets aren’t locked in contracts, they’re minted on destination chains through its messaging system. It’s not just a bridge, but a universal messaging protocol.
⏺ Wormhole started as a classic lock-and-mint bridge. Today it has evolved into a full messaging protocol while keeping its bridge infrastructure.
How they work
⏺ Wormhole runs on a Guardian network. 19 validators (Guardians) sign messages, creating a cryptographic proof (VAA) that gets relayed to the target chain. It’s fast but more centralized, and a majority attack on validators could pose risks.
⏺ LayerZero uses the Ultra Light Node (ULN). Transactions are verified by two independent parties: an oracle (like Chainlink) and a relayer chosen by the app or user. This setup is flexible and lets developers fine-tune trust assumptions, but integration is more complex.
Both support major EVM chains plus Solana, Aptos, Sui, and many others.
🔒 Security
⏺ Wormhole was hacked in 2022 for $325M, exposing bridge contract risks. Protections have improved since, but validator centralization remains a weak spot.
⏺ LayerZero has not been hacked. Its main criticism is reliance on oracles and relayers. Without proper configuration, security can suffer, so developers integrating it carry part of the responsibility.
📊 Market position
⏺ $W (CMC #141) vs $ZRO (CMC #124)
⏺ $W: MCap $365M, FDV $770M, 24h Vol $41.7M
⏺ $ZRO: MCap $445M, FDV $1.85B, 24h Vol $23.2M
Despite similar market caps, ZRO’s FDV is much higher, reflecting both lower circulating supply and strong expectations for future unlocks.
📈 Metrics
⏺ Wormhole: 1B+ messages, 200+ apps, 30+ chains
⏺ LayerZero: 154M+ messages, 300+ apps, 120+ chains
💸 Investments
⏺ Wormhole: $225M (Multicoin, Jump Trading, Brevan Howard, others)
⏺ LayerZero: $318M (a16z, Sequoia, Multicoin, Delphi Digital, Binance Labs, others)
Both attracted top-tier investors, but LayerZero raised more and has broader backing, signaling higher confidence in its model.
👥 Community
⏺ Wormhole: CMC 101.8k, X 382k, GitHub 671
⏺ LayerZero: CMC 84.3k, X 726k, GitHub 2.5k
💡 Takeaway
⏺ LayerZero leads in market cap, app adoption, chain coverage, VC backing, and community engagement. It already looks like a core piece of crypto infrastructure.
⏺ Wormhole trails on some metrics but its strong Solana ties, ecosystem growth, and experience handling critical incidents keep it relevant.
Both aim to set the standard for cross-chain messaging. The question is: who will lock in the lead?
👉 More on LayerZero here:
0 6,464
PEPE
0.00001111
2.4 yr
-2.18%
TX:119
Holders
485,321
CAP
$4,672,208,294
LIQ
$64,429,615
MILK
0.04958342
5 MOn
-0.01%
TX:1585
Holders
9,572
CAP
$7,496,025
LIQ
$1,251,223
$WIF
0.90402141
1.8 yr
-1.88%
TX:2805
Holders
254,521
CAP
$902,972,754
LIQ
$20,177,383
IKA
0.04955625
2 MOn
-0.9%
TX:507
Holders
8,992
CAP
$495,562,545
LIQ
$2,219,469
HUMANUS
0.00963282
18 H
-4.92%
TX:87
Holders
3,082
CAP
$9,632,816
LIQ
$537,995